State v. Keyonnie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when “the defendant’s right to counsel was admittedly violated but his ability to gather exculpatory evidence was not hindered[,] ... the appropriate remedy for such a violation [wa]s suppression of the breath test results”
• “[O]nly when police conduct interferes with both the defendant’s right to counsel and his ability to obtain exculpatory evidence is [d]ismissal of the case with prejudice . . . the appropriate remedy[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rosengren
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-16· cited 76×
• State v. Penney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-01-31· cited 20×
• State of Arizona v. Luis Armando Peraza
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-01-28· cited 9×
• State of Arizona v. Esgardo Javier Nevarez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-05-30· cited 8×
• State v. Rumsey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31· cited 6×
• State of Arizona v. Glenda Lorraine Rumsey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31
• State of Iowa v. Matthew Robert Sewell
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-06-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• McNutt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-07-09· cited 79×
• Montano v. Superior Court Pima County
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-10· cited 60×
• Smith v. Cada
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-02-15· cited 59×
• State v. Holland
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-12-09· cited 42×
• Kunzler v. Pima County Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-09-24· cited 34×
• State v. Juarez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-04-06· cited 25×