Skip to main content
· 1/28/2016

State of Arizona v. Luis Armando Peraza

Citations

  • 239 Ariz. 140
  • 366 P.3d 1030
  • 731 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
  • 2016 Ariz. App. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that if breath tests occur more than two hours after driving, the state is required to relate the results back to the relevant time for the results to be admissible
  • noting the defendant “bears the burden to show he was prejudiced” by the error, and that the “fact-intensive inquiry . . . required to establish prejudice” necessarily differs from case to case
  • erroneous jury instructions harmless if state can show beyond reasonable doubt that error did not affect verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Espinosa, Staring

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.