Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/30/1989
State v. French
Citations
- 564 A.2d 1058
- 152 Vt. 72
- 1989 Vt. LEXIS 130
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determination of claim of speedy trial violation is within discretion of trial judge
- no confrontation clause violation where defendant permitted to cross-examine witness on her inconsistent recollection of facts and her motive for testifying, but not permitted to cross-examine her about dropped criminal charge or unduly prejudicial prior inconsistent statement
- standard on review of a motion for judgment of acquittal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Morse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-03-14· cited 69×
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-09-11· cited 42×
- State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-08· cited 41×
- State v. BrochuSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-03-07· cited 37×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-16· cited 25×
- State v. KeithSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-05-21· cited 17×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-06-21· cited 17×
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-09-22· cited 15×
- In Re WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-05-11· cited 9×
- State v. LavaletteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-08· cited 6×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-10-24· cited 5×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-05-10· cited 4×
- State v. PellerinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-10-27· cited 4×
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-08· cited 3×
- State v. LundSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-06-16· cited 2×
- State v. QuirozSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-05-23· cited 1×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-05-25· cited 824×
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 594×
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-13· cited 85×
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-30· cited 61×
- State v. PatnaudeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-03· cited 58×
- State v. BerardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1974-02-05· cited 47×
- State v. UnwinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-11-05· cited 41×
- State v. TeitleSupreme Court of Vermont· 1952-05-06· cited 34×
- State v. RaymondSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-11-25· cited 28×
- State v. RobillardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-02-28· cited 26×
- State v. LaroseSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-02· cited 25×
- State v. TromblySupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-07-24· cited 19×
- State v. BressetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-06-06· cited 17×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-11-17· cited 15×
- State v. McBurneySupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-10-26· cited 14×
- State v. CovellSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-10-25· cited 14×
- State v. SnideSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-07· cited 5×
- State v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-11-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.