Seventh Elect Church v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the ethics rule of attorney-client confidentiality is a higher standard than the statutory attorney-client privilege
• counsel required to answer questions about fee arrangements and billings to client
• construing DR 4-101 of the Code of Professional Responsibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dietz v. Doe
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 57×
• MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST McKEAN
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-03-06· cited 31×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McKean
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-03-06· cited 30×
• State v. Mendez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-19· cited 15×
• State v. Keenan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 10×
• State v. Sheppard
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-09-19· cited 9×
• In re Original Grand Jury Investigation
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-09-06· cited 8×
• Dietz v. Doe
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-03-08· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Baird v. Koerner
  Ninth Circuit· 1960-06-06· cited 215×
• Dike v. Dike
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-12-05· cited 136×
• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena For: William Lathan Osterhoudt, Luxana Phaksuan. Luxana Phaksuan, Movant-Appellant v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-12-30· cited 65×
• United States v. Hodge & Zweig
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-02-16· cited 56×
• In the Matter of Witnesses Before the Special March 1980 Grand Jury. Appeal of United States of America
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-03-02· cited 53×
• Seventh Elect Church in Israel v. Rogers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-02-28· cited 28×