State v. Kasper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• faulting court of appeals and holding that trial court at Spreigl hearing had broad discretion to decide whether or not to require state to call Spreigl witnesses or instead to rely on prosecutor’s offer of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kennedy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-11-05· cited 108×
• State v. Kilgore
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-09-12· cited 71×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-28· cited 59×
• State v. Frisinger
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-05-01· cited 46×
• State v. Kilgore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-10· cited 44×
• State v. Dana
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-04-15· cited 33×
• Santiago v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-23· cited 25×
• People v. Davis
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-12-24· cited 24×
• State v. Belssner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-12-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Doughman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-04· cited 52×
• State v. McAdoo
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-02-11· cited 46×
• State v. Lindahl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-08-28· cited 45×
• State v. Wakefield
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-16· cited 30×
• State v. Casady
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-08-26· cited 12×
• Muhammed v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-03-12· cited 7×
• State v. Lande
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-06-15· cited 5×
• State v. Kasper
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-26· cited 2×