Skip to main content

State v. Jordan

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 2462

Syllabus

The trial court's explanation for denying appellant's application under R.C. 2953.73(D) was reasonable and was not contrary to law. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's application as DNA testing was generally accepted, the results of DNA testing were generally admissible in evidence, and DNA testing was available at the time of trial. The trial court's alternative determination that DNA testing on the requested items would not prove outcome determinative was also reasonable.

Judges: Mentel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.