State v. Jordan
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2462
Syllabus
The trial court's explanation for denying appellant's application under R.C. 2953.73(D) was reasonable and was not contrary to law. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's application as DNA testing was generally accepted, the results of DNA testing were generally admissible in evidence, and DNA testing was available at the time of trial. The trial court's alternative determination that DNA testing on the requested items would not prove outcome determinative was also reasonable.
Judges: Mentel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 870×
- State v. PierceOhio Supreme Court· 1992-09-02· cited 78×
- State v. BuehlerOhio Supreme Court· 2007-04-04· cited 52×
- State v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 43×
- State v. PradeOhio Supreme Court· 2010-05-04· cited 23×
- State v. EmerickOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-28· cited 10×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-21· cited 6×
- State v. AuerswaldOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-29· cited 2×
- State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.