Court of Appeals of Iowa· 7/22/2009

State v. Jorgensen

Citations

785 N.W.2d 708
2009 Iowa App. LEXIS 679
2009 WL 6669306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that even when a party does advance a standard for interpreting the Iowa Constitution differently, we may still interpret it using the federal analysis if we find that the defendant did not offer “sound reasons” for the distinction
noting that even when a party does advance a standard for interpreting the Iowa Constitution differently, we may still interpret it using the federal analysis if we find that the defendant did not offer “sound reasons” for the distinction
noting that even when a party does advance a standard for interpreting the Iowa Constitution differently, we may still interpret it using the federal analysis if we find that the defendant did not offer “sound reasons” for the distinction
applying Wade in determining counsel was not ineffective by failing to urge section 903B.2 constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under federal and state constitutions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Sackett, Vogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.