Skip to main content

State v. Jorgensen

Citations

  • 758 N.W.2d 830
  • 2008 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 164
  • 2008 WL 5274402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that indecent exposure could occur where the exposure was “in such 10 a place or under such circumstances that the exhibition is liable to be seen by others”
  • concluding behavior of defendant was clearly sexually motivated when he wandered through a store, “fondled his penis through his clothing, and then, as he followed an unidentified woman through the store, removed his penis from his shorts and openly masturbated”
  • finding sufficient evidence of sexual gratification based on the defendant’s fondling of his penis
  • finding probable cause to invoke implied consent when the officer smelled “the strong odor of alcohol on [the defendant’s] breath, obtained a concession that he had been drinking, and performed the horizontal gaze nystagmus test”
  • “It is reasonable to assume that a person who exposes himself in a public place runs 6 the risk that he will be observed by more than his targeted audience.”
  • describing indecent exposure as “essentially a visual assault crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ternus, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.