State v. Hernandez-Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, although the appellate courts generally refrain from reviewing moot issues, “an exception exists for issues of broad public importance likely to recur”
• concluding an alleged violation of statutory rights was not preserved where it was raised for the first time on appeal
• stating that when the asserted right is fundamental, strict scrutiny is the appropriate analysis
• stating that when the asserted right is fundamental, strict scrutiny is the appropriate analysis
• noting that, in general, constitutional issues must be preserved regardless of “importance and gravity”
• citing, in part, Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 334, 96 S.Ct. 893, 902, 47 L.Ed.2d 18, 33 (1976)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).