Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/28/1973
State v. Holland
Citations
- 201 S.E.2d 118
- 261 S.C. 488
- 1973 S.C. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding trial court’s cautionary instructions to the jury in a joint trial “protected the rights of each individual appellant”
- “[T]he granting or the refusal of an adjournment or suspension of a trial of a criminal case rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.”
- no prejudice in limiting number of peremptory challenges where defendants used fewer than allowed
- no prejudice in limiting number of peremptory challenges where defendants used fewer than allowed
- no prejudice in limiting number of peremptory challenges where defendants used fewer than allowed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moss, Lewis, Brailsford, Littlejohn, Bussey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KelseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 143×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-11-28· cited 69×
- State v. PlathSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-07· cited 60×
- State v. GaskinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-22· cited 58×
- State v. GoolsbySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-06-24· cited 49×
- State v. DennisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-22· cited 46×
- State v. GulledgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-02-16· cited 32×
- State v. SkipperSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-02-12· cited 26×
- State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-30· cited 25×
- State v. ShortSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 20×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-02-11· cited 19×
- State v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-31· cited 18×
- State v. HurdCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-12-16· cited 15×
- State v. LemireCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-10-16· cited 14×
- Youmans v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-09-24· cited 11×
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-19· cited 11×
- State v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-11-05· cited 11×
- Anthony Green v. William D. Catoe, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaFourth Circuit· 2000-08-01· cited 10×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-07-25· cited 10×
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-27· cited 10×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- State v. BRITTSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1959-12-17· cited 61×
- State v. CroweSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-04-21· cited 55×
- State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1958-04-08· cited 48×
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1960-11-16· cited 38×
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-10-28· cited 35×
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-11-14· cited 31×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-11-03· cited 30×
- State v. DeWittSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-08-05· cited 19×
- State v. HamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-07-17· cited 16×
- State v. WheelerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-12-11· cited 15×
- State v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1897-07-12· cited 15×
- State v. BellueSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-11-20· cited 13×
- State v. WyseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1890-01-15· cited 13×
- State v. ParlerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-05-11· cited 12×
- State v. GANTTSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1953-05-20· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.