State v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, 256 State v. W. V. when a statute does not define a term of common usage, “we assume that the legislature intended them to have their plain, ordinary meanings”
• interpreting second-degree criminal mis- chief statute, ORS 164.354(1)(b), to mean that if the dam- age is caused intentionally, second-degree criminal mischief does not require evidence of a specific value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Goldberg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-10· cited 9×
• State v. Santini
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-20· cited 2×
• State v. W. V.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-30· cited 2×
• State v. Barnett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-02

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
• State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuela
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-24· cited 71×
• State v. Murray
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 65×
• State v. Dickerson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-12· cited 49×
• Kohring v. Ballard
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-04-24· cited 40×
• State v. Bailey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-07-30· cited 38×
• Comcast Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Dep't of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-08-16· cited 16×
• State v. Waterhouse
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 14×
• State v. Nyhuis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-22· cited 3×