State v. Jones
Citations
- 337 Conn. 486
Syllabus
In accordance with State v. Patterson (276 Conn. 452), a trial court in a criminal case must issue a special credibility instruction to the jury when a jailhouse informant testifies about inculpatory statements made by a fellow inmate to the informant while they were incarcerated together. Convicted, after a jury trial, of the crimes of murder, carrying a pistol without a permit, and criminal possession of a firearm in connection with the shooting death of the victim, the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, claiming, inter alia, that the trial court improperly denied his request for a special credibility instruction concerning the testimony of jailhouse informants as it related to one of the state's key witnesses, S. At trial, the state presented no physical evidence linking the defendant to the victim's murder or to the firearm used, instead relying on the testimony of S, among other witnesses. S had approached the police more than two years after the shooting while he was in pretrial detention on two felony charges, hoping for a favorable disposition on his pending charges in exchange for information about the victim's murder. S told the police that he had seen the defendant when he was visiting the housing complex where the victim was murdered on the night in question and that, shortly thereafter, had heard gunshots. S also told the police that he and the defendant were watching television together the day after the shooting when S, who was holding a handgun, confessed to shooting the victim. The defendant requested that the trial court give a special credibility instruction concerning S's testimony in accordance with this court's decision in Patterson. The trial court denied the defen- dant's request and, instead, issued a general credibility instruction. On appeal, the Appellate Court affirmed the judgment of conviction, con- cluding, inter alia, that the defendant was not entitled to the special credibility instruction that he had sought because S did n
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that special credibility instruction is required when jail- house informant testifies because such testimony must be reviewed with particular scrutiny in light of witness’ powerful motive to falsify his or her testimony
- Jailhouse informants have ‘‘a powerful incentive, fueled by self-interest, to implicate falsely the accused. Conse- quently, the testimony of such an informant . . . is inevitably suspect.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson; Palmer; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Kahn; Ecker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrunySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-02-07· cited 22×
- State v. PatelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-03-22· cited 11×
- State v. Adam P.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-02-11· cited 11×
- State v. SaylesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-03-26· cited 10×
- State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-03-07· cited 7×
- State v. Giovanni D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-12-09
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
- On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 644×
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 393×
- California v. TybergSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 383×
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-25· cited 99×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-12-20· cited 95×
- State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-03· cited 74×
- United States v. Joe Garcia, Guillermo Sandoval, and Mario SandovalFifth Circuit· 1976-04-26· cited 67×
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-21· cited 63×
- State v. SlaterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-01-22· cited 62×
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-29· cited 55×
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. John C. Dela RosaNinth Circuit· 1981-05-15· cited 54×
- State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-28· cited 49×
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-16· cited 49×
- State v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-01-22· cited 44×
- Macdermid, Inc. v. LeonettiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-05-15· cited 37×
- United States v. Arlynton L. Prawl, A/K/A PoohSecond Circuit· 1999-02-19· cited 32×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-06-28· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.