Supreme Court of Missouri· 11/3/1998

State v. Jones

Citations

979 S.W.2d 171
1998 Mo. LEXIS 79
1998 WL 772777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding no abuse of discretion when court allowed defense counsel to explain and question the venire on full range of punishment
“Questions concerning a judge’s qualification to hear a case usually are not constitutional questions; rather, they are questions answered by common law, statute, or the code of judicial conduct.”
“Questions concerning a judge’s qualification to hear a case usually are not constitutional questions; rather, they are questions answered by common law, statute, or the code of judicial conduct.”
“Rule 29.15(h) does not require an evidentiary hearing if the motion court determines that the files and records of the case conclusively show that the movant is not entitled to relief.”
Defense counsel stated, “I would also like to make a brief record at this point. It seems as if based on the Court’s tone and demeanor that it is angry with what I have just done.”
prosecutor may rebut defense counsel’s questionable line of argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.