Skip to main content

Morris v. State

Citations

  • 477 A.2d 1206
  • 59 Md. App. 659
  • 1984 Md. App. LEXIS 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the work product doctrine “is intended to protect and to act as a limitation upon pretrial discovery of a lawyer’s strategies, legal theories and mental impressions”
  • Allowing the prosecution to summon an expert originally retained by the defense because the expert’s tests on the accused’s clothing destroyed the clothing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Liss, Morton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.