Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/16/1984
Morris v. State
Citations
- 477 A.2d 1206
- 59 Md. App. 659
- 1984 Md. App. LEXIS 390
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the work product doctrine “is intended to protect and to act as a limitation upon pretrial discovery of a lawyer’s strategies, legal theories and mental impressions”
- Allowing the prosecution to summon an expert originally retained by the defense because the expert’s tests on the accused’s clothing destroyed the clothing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan, Liss, Morton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-15· cited 84×
- General Motors Corp. v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-06-23· cited 52×
- State v. PawlykWashington Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 52×
- Hymon v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-05-26· cited 32×
- Blair v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-06· cited 19×
- United States v. WalkerN.D. New York· 1995-11-28· cited 16×
- Diggs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-28· cited 10×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-04· cited 9×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-08-10· cited 6×
- Davis v. PetitoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-02-28· cited 3×
- Hutchins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-09-29· cited 3×
- Pope, Curtis Wayne Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-15
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- Chisley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-03-20· cited 147×
- Colvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-16· cited 90×
- State v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-02-26· cited 86×
- State v. RuskCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-01-13· cited 75×
- Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-10-20· cited 49×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-16· cited 44×
- State Highway Commission v. EarlSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1966-06-02· cited 27×
- Levitsky v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-08· cited 22×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-04-07· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.