Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/22/2000

People v. Spiezer

Citations

  • 735 N.E.2d 1017
  • 316 Ill. App. 3d 75
  • 249 Ill. Dec. 192
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 694

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the work-product doctrine prohibited the prosecution from \discovering the identity and reports of non[-]testifying experts retained by the defense and [] from calling such experts to testify at trial\
  • finding that the work-product doctrine prohibited the prosecution from “discovering the identity and reports of non[-]testifying experts retained by the defense and [ ] from calling such experts to testify at trial”
  • discussing Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510-11 (1947)
  • governing disclosures by the prosecution to the defense
  • evidence of attorney’s strategy not discoverable
  • evidence of attorney's strategy not discoverable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geiger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Spiezer

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.