People v. Spiezer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the work-product doctrine prohibited the prosecution from \discovering the identity and reports of non[-]testifying experts retained by the defense and [] from calling such experts to testify at trial\
• finding that the work-product doctrine prohibited the prosecution from “discovering the identity and reports of non[-]testifying experts retained by the defense and [ ] from calling such experts to testify at trial”
• discussing Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510-11 (1947)
• governing disclosures by the prosecution to the defense
• evidence of attorney’s strategy not discoverable
• evidence of attorney's strategy not discoverable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).