United States v. Demetrio J. Hernandez and Wayne Parrish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a prosecutor‘s commentary on a defendant‘s post-arrest, pre-Miranda silence violated the defendant‘s Fifth Amendment privilege
• noting that defendant did not suffer the \inherent prejudice\ of \unwarranted interference by the court\
• noting that petitioner who withdrew guilty plea could not claim prejudice from that plea
• finding comments during the government’s case-in-chief regarding the defendant’s refusal to speak with arresting officers violated the defendant’s right to remain silent
• \A defendant's silence before Miranda warnings is admissible to impeach the defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).