Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 10/18/1989

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 46 Ohio St. 3d 96
  • 545 N.E.2d 636
  • 1989 Ohio LEXIS 261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that lying is a “circumstance tending to show consciousness of guilt.”
  • where \the alternatives presented to the jury and charged in the specifications were not conceptually distinct * * * a `patchwork' or less than unanimous verdict was not possible\
  • where “the alternatives presented to the jury and charged in the specifications were not conceptually distinct * * * a ‘patchwork’ or less than unanimous verdict was not possible”
  • “The Ohio Supreme Court has recognized that lying tends to show consciousness of guilt.”
  • overruled on other grounds by State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259, 282 (1991)
  • lying about presence at crime scene

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Snick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.