Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/30/2021
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2254
Syllabus
Case affirmed, where trial court performed proper analysis and made adequate findings pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Matter remanded so trial court can amend its sentencing entry via a nunc pro tunc order to include the trial court's consecutive sentence findings.
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-18· cited 14×
- State v. SchausOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-19· cited 7×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-28· cited 2×
- State v. CofieldOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-22· cited 1×
- State v. AitkenOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-10
- State v. GillOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-25
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-03· cited 38×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-23· cited 16×
- State v. MayberryOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-24· cited 14×
- State v. ElmoreOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 8×
- State v. ChaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-19· cited 8×
- State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.