State v. Cole

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 4646

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not contrary to law because the trial court made the appropriate R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings at the sentencing hearing. Although the trial court failed to properly incorporate all of its consecutive sentencing findings into its judgment entry of sentence, the trial court may correct this error via a nunc pro tunc order.