Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/10/2023

State v. Aitken

Citations

2023 Ohio 738

Syllabus

Offenses committed against different victims during the same course of conduct are committed with a separate animus for each offense and the crimes against each victim are of dissimilar import. Appeal of right under R.C. 2953.08(A)(1)(b) as a result of the imposition of maximum sentence is found not well-taken.

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. Ruff
Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
State v. Rogers
Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
State v. Gwynne
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-12-23· cited 142×
State v. Toles (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-10-04· cited 92×
State v. Tellis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-30· cited 19×
State v. White
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-05· cited 8×
State v. Johnson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 8×
State v. Dobbins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-29· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.