State v. Haas

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 1852

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., appellant is not entitled to withdraw his plea under Crim.R. 32.1 because he failed to show manifest injustice. He was convicted of violating a protection order that was valid on the date of the violation, and petitioner's decision to dismiss her petition—causing the common pleas court to dissolve the ex parte CPO—did not negate appellant's failure to obey a valid court order.