Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/13/1991
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 61 Wash. App. 235
- 809 P.2d 764
- 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statement made one day after crime inadmissible because not probative of defendant’s state of mind on day of crime where no evidence indicated she had same state of mind on earlier date
- statement made one day after crime inadmissible because not probative of defendant’s state of mind on day of crime where no evidence indicated she had same state of mind on earlier date
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 272×
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-09· cited 90×
- State Of Washington, V. Timothy Forrest BassCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-08-16· cited 26×
- State Of Washington, V. Timothy Forrest BassCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-06-01
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LeechWashington Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 112×
- State v. StubsjoenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-08· cited 45×
- People v. MartesCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1988-08-15· cited 6×
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-06-12· cited 5×
- People v. BehnckeCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1988-10-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.