Idaho Supreme Court· 4/29/1987
State v. Johns
Citations
- 736 P.2d 1327
- 112 Idaho 873
- 1987 Ida. LEXIS 309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, under the totality of circumstances, “it was entirely reasonable for [the officer] to handcuff Johns for his own safety without negating the legality” of the investigative detention
- addressing whether a detention amounted to a de facto arrest where the defendant sought to suppress his statements during the seizure
- addressing whether a detention amounted to a de facto arrest where the defendant sought to suppress his statements during the seizure
- no Miranda violation where defendant’s independent concern for his girlfriend was the motive for his confession
- “[Rjefusal of defen dant’s requested instructions allegedly dealing with his defense theory is not error where that proposed statement is ... not supported by the evidence_”
- defendant challenging on direct appeal the trial court’s conclusion that the conduct concerning the murder was divisible from the conduct constituting the robbery, which was based upon the evidence in the record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bakes, Huntley, Bistline, Shepard, Donaldson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-11-15· cited 240×
- State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-01-09· cited 156×
- State v. ClementsIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-10-15· cited 137×
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-07-10· cited 131×
- State v. DuValtIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-06-24· cited 110×
- State v. WhiteleyIdaho Court of Appeals· 1993-07-09· cited 99×
- State v. YagerIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-02-11· cited 96×
- State v. FryIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-10-08· cited 79×
- State v. GallegosIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 74×
- State v. RawlingsIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-03-20· cited 62×
- State v. EastmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-05-01· cited 58×
- State v. BrownIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-01-02· cited 57×
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-07-29· cited 52×
- Oien v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-08-17· cited 47×
- State v. PageIdaho Supreme Court· 2000-09-05· cited 44×
- State v. RolesIdaho Court of Appeals· 1992-01-27· cited 40×
- State v. MolenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-01-12· cited 39×
- State v. OsborneIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-12-03· cited 34×
- State v. AlsaneaIdaho Court of Appeals· 2003-01-16· cited 32×
- State v. PannellIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-07-10· cited 31×
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 1,649×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-04-24· cited 1,166×
- State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-05-05· cited 549×
- People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-09-05· cited 313×
- State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court· 1978-07-17· cited 302×
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothNinth Circuit· 1982-02-08· cited 293×
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-07-09· cited 220×
- People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-06-28· cited 155×
- United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightNinth Circuit· 1984-09-18· cited 146×
- Sivak v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 125×
- State v. GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-04-03· cited 108×
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 101×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.