Idaho Supreme Court· 5/1/1992

State v. Eastman

Citations

831 P.2d 555
122 Idaho 87
1992 Ida. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“A defendant’s requested instruction need not be given if it was ... not supported by the facts of the case.”
\a defendant might choose to forego an opportunity to be convicted of a lesser included offense in order to roll the dice in the hope that the jury might acquit him/her on the greater charge\
\a defendant might choose to forego an opportunity to be convicted of a lesser included offense in order to roll the dice in the hope that the jury might acquit him/her on the greater charge\
“a defendant might choose to forego an opportunity to be convicted of a lesser included offense in order to roll the dice in the hope that the jury might acquit him/her on the greater charge”
discussing primarily subpart (a) of I.C. § 19-2132

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bakes, Bistline, Johnson, McDevitt, Schilling, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.