State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A police officer is not per se ‘interested’ merely by virtue of his or her involvement in a criminal investigation”
• “A police officer is not per se ‘interested’ merely by virtue of his or her involvement in a criminal investigation, absent evidence of some personal connection with the participants or personal stake in the case’s outcome.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Karl A. Schledwitz v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-03-03· cited 68×
• State v. Sucharew
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-11· cited 42×
• State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-11-13· cited 32×
• State v. Eddington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-17· cited 21×
• State v. Joe
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-01-21· cited 7×
• State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-Mercado
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-06-20· cited 6×
• State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-17
• State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-11-20

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bible
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
• State v. Atwood
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
• State v. Allred
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-09· cited 33×
• State v. Thomas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-16· cited 14×
• State v. Beck
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-05-22· cited 13×
• State v. Moran
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-09-18· cited 10×
• State v. Nevarez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-12-28· cited 6×