Supreme Court of New Jersey· 10/24/2006
State v. Jimenez
Citations
- 908 A.2d 181
- 188 N.J. 390
- 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1520
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that it is appropriate for the defendant to bear the burden of proving mental retardation and noting that \[elvery state that has addressed the issue has found that the defendant should bear the burden of proof on an Atkins claim\
- setting forth comprehensive New Jersey procedure for Atkins claims under its \general supervisory authority over trial administration\
- setting forth comprehensive New Jersey procedure for Atkins claims under its “general supervisory authority over trial administration”
- establishing guidelines but referring to procedural rules committee
- establish guidelines but refer to procedural rules committee
- but death penalty no longer available in New Jersey
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Justices Lavecchia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-21· cited 300×
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 176×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2008-02-19· cited 69×
- Howell v. TrammellTenth Circuit· 2013-09-05· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. BraceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 28×
- Thomas v. AllenN.D. Alabama· 2009-04-21· cited 25×
- State v. HandySupreme Court of New Jersey· 2013-09-09· cited 24×
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-04-26· cited 21×
- Roosevelt Arthur Williams v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-05-17· cited 10×
- State v. HandyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-08-04· cited 7×
- State v. JimenezSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-06-18· cited 6×
- Anthony Carr v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2016-08-11· cited 5×
- Thomas, Kenneth DewayneCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-22
- In re Pers. Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2017-05-18
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,525×
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 1,010×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-10-19· cited 820×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-24· cited 515×
- State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-08-02· cited 379×
- Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-11· cited 331×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-04-26· cited 268×
- State v. FortinSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-02-06· cited 163×
- Pruitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-09-13· cited 135×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.