State v. Jayne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in that case the “defendant did not argue, and the trial court did not find, that the [urinalysis] evidence was so lacking in foundation that it was inadmissible per se under OEC 702”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Chipman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-29· cited 14×
• State v. Fong
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-19· cited 5×
• State v. Moody
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-03· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
• State v. O'Key
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
• State v. Lyons
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 81×
• State v. Moylett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-16· cited 59×
• Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-11-17· cited 52×
• State v. Sampson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-24· cited 41×
• State v. McFeron
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-08· cited 9×
• State v. Stiles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-23· cited 8×