State v. Segotta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing rule that a statute is not to be construed in such a manner that renders it unconstitutional
• stating that conspiracy is seldom 3 susceptible of direct proof and may be proven by inference from circumstantial 4 evidence
• listing “pattern of conduct indicating ... serious threat to society” as a potential aggravating factor
• noting that “we presume [a] statute to be constitutional”
• factors to be considered in decision to aggravate include potential for rehabilitation, indications of whether the defendant is a threat to society, and events surrounding crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).