Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/13/2002
State v. Buchanan
Citations
- 57 P.3d 930
- 185 Or. App. 68
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1754
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he scope of a person’s consent does not turn on what that person subjectively intended. Rather it turns on what a reasonable person would have intended.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Kistler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 332×
- State v. PortreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-24· cited 39×
- State v. Arroyo-SoteloCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-16· cited 28×
- State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-31· cited 17×
- Roe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-07· cited 12×
- State v. HelowCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-06· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.