Skip to main content

State v. Jacobowitz

Citations

  • 194 Conn. 408
  • 480 A.2d 557
  • 1984 Conn. LEXIS 686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implicitly recognizing court's discretion in concluding that trial court properly could have declined to instruct jury on lesser included offense in absence of request
  • implicitly recognizing court’s discretion in concluding that trial court properly could have declined to instruct jury on lesser included offense in absence of request
  • defendant charged with criminal attempt to commit murder was not entitled to have trial judge instruct jury on lesser included offenses, where defendant failed to request such a charge
  • implicitly recognizing court’s discretion in concluding that trial court properly could have declined to instruct jury on lesser included offense in absence of request
  • implicitly recognizing court's discretion in concluding that trial court properly could have declined to instruct jury on lesser included offense in absence of request
  • trial court did not err when it did not charge, sua sponte, on extreme emotional disturbance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.