Skip to main content

State v. Thomas

Citations

  • 62 Conn. App. 356
  • 772 A.2d 611
  • 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unpreserved sufficiency of 'the evidence claims are not reviewable under the plain error doctrine because they involve a fundamental constitutional right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.