Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying nonconstitutional harmless error standard to improper admission of hearsay evidence
• denying Fluor's CR 59 motion for a new trial or amended judgment and holding that the awards in question were supported by the evidence and therefore not the result of passion or prejudice as a matter of law
• trial court has discretion to grant new trial if damage award is contrary to evidence
• appellants cannot raise issues for the first time on appeal because it deprives the appellate courts of an adequate record on review
• \The error [of admitting improper hearsay] is harmless unless it was reasonably probable that it changed the outcome of the triaL\
• “A party who fails to raise an issue at trial normally waives the right to raise that issue on appeal.” (citing RAP 2.5(a))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).