Skip to main content

State v. Andrew

Citations

  • 301 Kan. 36
  • 340 P.3d 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a party preserved an instructional issue for appellate review by articulating specific reasons for an objection
  • finding that a party preserved an instructional issue for appellate review by articulating specific reasons for an objection
  • using the harmless error standard for errors involving a defendant's theory of defense
  • using the harmless-error standard for errors involving a defendant's theory of defense
  • court presumes criminal defendant should have known law of self-defense
  • interpreting similar language in K.S.A. 21-5221 regarding self-defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.