Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/10/2015
State v. Knox
Citations
- 301 Kan. 671
- 342 P.3d 656
- 2015 Kan. LEXIS 223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding prosecutorial error was harmless since significant evidence, including testimony by several independent witnesses and physical evidence, supported jury's verdict
- finding prosecutor's statement that it was defense counsel's job to \'make [the witnesses] look like liars'\ was misconduct because it disparaged opposing counsel
- misconduct for prosecutor to comment about defense counsel's experience because the statement relied on facts outside the evidence
- \The prosecutor's statement that it was defense counsel's job to 'make [the witnesses] look like liars' disparaged the role of defense counsel in the adversarial process.\
- \The prosecutor's statement that it was defense counsel's job to 'make [the witnesses] look like liars' disparaged the role of defense counsel in the adversarial process.\
- Prosecutor erred by stating her personal opinion that witness \'was brutally honest on the stand'\ and told \'the truth'\ because \comments were unsworn and unchecked statements that are not fair commentary on the evidence.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luckert, Malone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-10-05· cited 154×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas· 2020-02-28· cited 118×
- State v. HirshSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-08-02· cited 97×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-08-05· cited 95×
- State v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-11-21· cited 73×
- State v. StatenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-08-12· cited 53×
- State v. QuallsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-04-19· cited 17×
- State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2015-10-02· cited 9×
- State v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-11-20· cited 8×
- State v. SebaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-09-30
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-09-30
- State v. LouisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-11-23
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Kansas· 2017-12-01
- State v. McLinnSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-01-26
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2026-01-09
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 1,316×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-03-27· cited 398×
- State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-24· cited 337×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-09-21· cited 301×
- State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-02-11· cited 246×
- State v. ElnickiSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 169×
- State v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-07-03· cited 141×
- State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-10-31· cited 141×
- State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-08-09· cited 133×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-07-25· cited 125×
- State v. KettlerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-05-23· cited 124×
- State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-07-09· cited 119×
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-05-23· cited 106×
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-07-27· cited 81×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-01-24· cited 78×
- National Bank of Andover v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-03-05· cited 76×
- State v. InkelaarSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-21· cited 73×
- State v. SalarySupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-03-13· cited 71×
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-04-25· cited 71×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.