Washington Supreme Court· 4/13/2006

State v. Jackman

Citations

132 P.3d 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that challenged jury instructions are subject to de novo review and considered in the context of the jury instructions as a whole
court commented on the evidence by putting victims' dates of birth in the to-convict instructions, where their minority was an element the State had to prove
\a defendant communicates with a minor under RCW 9.68A.090 if he or she invites or induces the minor to engage in prohibited conduct\
inclusion of child’s birthdate in element commented on evidence because it resolved element that child was a minor
claim that a jury instruction contains a judicial comment may be raised for the first time on appeal
“By stating the victims’ birth dates in the instructions, the court conveyed the impression that those dates had been proved to be true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairhurst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.