State v. Bohannon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that phrase \for the purposes of sexual stimulation of the viewer\ is unconstitutionally vague
• rejecting claim that phrase “for the purposes of sexual stimulation of the viewer” is unconstitutionally vague
• the language “for purposes of sexual stimulation” serves to clarify and narrow the reach of the statute, enabling the court to distinguish between permitted and prohibited photographs under the statute
• finding no communication if minor unaware of offending conduct
• finding no communication if minor unaware of offending conduct
• RCW 9.68A.040 not void for vagueness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bahl
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 425×
• State v. Hosier
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 167×
• State v. Jackman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-04-13· cited 152×
• State v. Chester
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-08-07· cited 141×
• State v. Maddox
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 123×
• State v. Hunter
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1996-06-19· cited 48×
• State v. Chester
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-06-28· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Savich
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-15· cited 16×
• State v. Harrington
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-17· cited 16×
• State v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-06-28· cited 12×
• State v. D.H.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-09-18· cited 9×
• State v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-08-25· cited 5×
• State v. Stellman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-05-18· cited 1×
• State v. DH
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-09-18
• State of Washington v. Russell Allen Harrington
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-17

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Workman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-09-07· cited 578×
• City of Seattle v. Eze
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-07-14· cited 234×
• State v. Pelkey
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 158×
• O'DAY v. King County
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-01-21· cited 139×
• State v. Brayman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-03-03· cited 116×
• State v. Farmer
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-07-02· cited 94×
• State v. Schimmelpfennig
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-05-03· cited 61×
• City of Seattle v. Rice
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 55×
• State v. Anderson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-02-26· cited 44×
• City of Seattle v. Shepherd
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-07-10· cited 43×
• Reesman v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-10-10· cited 40×
• State v. Riley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-28· cited 33×
• State v. Petty
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-27· cited 27×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-06-26· cited 26×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-03-17· cited 25×
• State v. Falco
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-09-24· cited 21×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-09· cited 10×