State v. Irvin
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1082
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in allowing the jury to consider the agreed-upon exhibits during deliberations; the trial court's statements to counsel and the jury reflected that it had deemed those exhibits admitted. Appellant did not demonstrate that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to cite Evid.R. 616(A) in seeking to ask a State's witness about her pending indictment on drug charges and motion for intervention in lieu of conviction. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-18· cited 551×
- State v. HectorOhio Supreme Court· 1969-07-30· cited 143×
- Oberlin v. Akron General Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court· 2001-03-28· cited 138×
- State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-03· cited 60×
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court· 2022-07-21· cited 55×
- United States v. Julio C. SantanaFirst Circuit· 1999-04-21· cited 35×
- State v. LloydOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-01· cited 35×
- State v. IrvinOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-09· cited 14×
- State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-30· cited 10×
- State v. DennisOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-19· cited 10×
- State v. McNealOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-19· cited 8×
- State v. IrvinOhio Supreme Court· 2022-10-12· cited 4×
- State v. WestOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 2×
- State v. IrvinOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-15· cited 2×
- State v. Galvez VillavicencioOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.