District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/12/2000
State v. Iaccarino
Citations
- 767 So. 2d 470
- 2000 WL 369084
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Walther to hold that off-duty police officers' searches of musical festival patrons violated the Fourth Amendment
- finding no implied consent where the “failure to acquiesce in a search would result in a deprivation of a patron’s right to attend the concert, if not their ticket cost as well”
- \We agree that the interest in protecting the performers from projectiles is a `vital interest' that would justify a search for those items which could be used as projectiles.\
- off-duty police officers, hired by private concert promoter to provide security, are state actors where sheriffs office had discretion to assign officers and officers had “complete discretion” as to how to conduct the searches
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-05-28· cited 55×
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-07-08· cited 53×
- Ray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 19×
- M.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-28· cited 8×
- Johnston v. Tampa Sports AuthorityEleventh Circuit· 2008-06-18· cited 7×
- Armstrong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-07· cited 7×
- State v. MoningerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-05· cited 6×
- Johnston v. Tampa Sports AuthorityEleventh Circuit· 2007-06-26· cited 5×
- Kevin Osorio v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-02· cited 5×
- Santiago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 5×
- Ratcliff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-09· cited 5×
- State v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-27· cited 4×
- State v. C.D.M.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-24· cited 3×
- State v. AlexanderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-22· cited 2×
- Johnston v. Tampa Sports AuthorityM.D. Florida· 2006-07-28· cited 2×
- Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-25· cited 2×
- MD v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-28
- State v. CDMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-24
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- William H. Traver v. David MeshriyNinth Circuit· 1980-08-25· cited 146×
- Jacobsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-03· cited 52×
- Timothy Mcgann v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1994-05-04· cited 43×
- United States v. Allan Gale CleavelandNinth Circuit· 1995-01-12· cited 39×
- Collier v. MillerS.D. Texas· 1976-05-28· cited 37×
- Nakamoto v. FasiHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-11-06· cited 36×
- Wheaton v. HaganM.D. North Carolina· 1977-08-11· cited 34×
- Gaioni v. FolmarM.D. Alabama· 1978-05-09· cited 25×
- Stroeber v. Commission Veteran's AuditoriumS.D. Iowa· 1977-10-14· cited 21×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-06-28· cited 18×
- United States v. Francis Joseph McGreevyNinth Circuit· 1981-08-03· cited 16×
- State v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-02-13· cited 14×
- Jensen v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-17· cited 13×
- Bernovich v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-01-17· cited 6×
Other cases named State v. Iaccarino
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.