State v. Hurtado
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 1465
Syllabus
Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance when his counsel advised him to plead guilty to the charged offense. The record also establishes that the trial court substantially complied with Crim.R. 11 in accepting appellant's plea. Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered appellant to pay a mandatory fine in the amount of $7,500.00. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-17· cited 3×
- State v. WhaleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-23· cited 3×
- State v. DapiceOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-04· cited 2×
- State v. CulbersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30
- State v. CastoOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-09
- State v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-29
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court· 1988-11-29· cited 13,912×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 437×
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 321×
- State v. DonleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-17· cited 20×
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-04-23· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.