Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/9/2021
State v. Casto
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2328
Syllabus
Appellant asserts that the sentence imposed by the trial court violated the parties' plea agreement, and, further, that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by not objecting to the sentence or filing a motion to allow appellant to withdraw the plea. But the record is silent regarding an agreed-upon sentence. This silence is fatal to appellant's arguments. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 940×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 321×
- State v. GilroyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-19· cited 19×
- State v. HurtadoOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-21· cited 6×
- State v. OlsenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.