State v. Whaley
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1434
Syllabus
After conducting an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no issues with arguable merit for appellant to advance on appeal. Appellant's claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to accurately advise him of the terms of the State's plea offer and by refusing to file a motion to withdraw the guilty plea on his behalf lack arguable merit. Judgments affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 321×
- State v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-23· cited 19×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-15· cited 18×
- State v. WattersOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-09· cited 8×
- State v. HurtadoOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-21· cited 6×
- State v. OlsenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-15· cited 5×
- State v. OldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.