Skip to main content

State v. Whaley

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1434

Syllabus

After conducting an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no issues with arguable merit for appellant to advance on appeal. Appellant's claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to accurately advise him of the terms of the State's plea offer and by refusing to file a motion to withdraw the guilty plea on his behalf lack arguable merit. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.