Washington Supreme Court· 2/19/1976
State v. Hull
Citations
- 546 P.2d 912
- 86 Wash. 2d 527
- 1976 Wash. LEXIS 876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expert testimony is not required in obscenity convictions and neither is its admission reversible error
- expert testimony is not required in obscenity convictions and neither is its admission reversible error
- admission of expert testimony of a psychiatrist regarding contemporary community standards did not constitute reversible error where psychiatrist conducted a five and one-half year study on the moral attitudes of residents pertaining to sexually explicit material
- seller examined cover and one inside page
- seller examined cover and one inside page
- cover and one inside page
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1978-11-16· cited 100×
- People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-02-25· cited 67×
- State v. ReeceWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-23· cited 67×
- State v. MartellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-01-16· cited 26×
- State v. GarbaccioCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-24· cited 25×
- In Re the Welfare of TarangoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-04-18· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-12-10· cited 19×
- Hagood v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-10-03· cited 13×
- United States v. PrybaE.D. Virginia· 1988-02-12· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 10×
- Culp v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-02-13· cited 5×
- People v. SpeerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-08-25· cited 5×
- Avlonitis v. Seattle District CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-11-10
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1960-06-13· cited 1,258×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 1,230×
- A Book Named \John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure\ v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 892×
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-01-27· cited 414×
- Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1974-06-24· cited 409×
- State v. J-R Distributors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1973-07-27· cited 127×
- Mason v. BittonWashington Supreme Court· 1975-05-08· cited 124×
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis and Peachtree News Company, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1973-11-15· cited 72×
- Krystad v. LauWashington Supreme Court· 1965-03-11· cited 71×
- Bryers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-05-31· cited 35×
- Foster v. KnutsonWashington Supreme Court· 1974-11-07· cited 34×
- O'CONNELL v. ConteWashington Supreme Court· 1969-06-19· cited 27×
- Baker v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1974-12-26· cited 16×
- United States v. LangC.D. California· 1973-07-18· cited 15×
- State v. TimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-10-29· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.