Skip to main content

State v. Hull

Citations

  • 546 P.2d 912
  • 86 Wash. 2d 527
  • 1976 Wash. LEXIS 876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expert testimony is not required in obscenity convictions and neither is its admission reversible error
  • expert testimony is not required in obscenity convictions and neither is its admission reversible error
  • admission of expert testimony of a psychiatrist regarding contemporary community standards did not constitute reversible error where psychiatrist conducted a five and one-half year study on the moral attitudes of residents pertaining to sexually explicit material
  • seller examined cover and one inside page
  • seller examined cover and one inside page
  • cover and one inside page

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.