Washington Supreme Court· 6/23/1988
State v. Reece
Citations
- 757 P.2d 947
- 110 Wash. 2d 766
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analysis of textual differences is the beginning of state constitutional analysis, it is not the end; if it were, the other Gunwall criteria would be superfluous
- \early constructions by the courts are relevant to the intent of various constitutional provisions\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodloe, Andersen, Utter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 308×
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 199×
- American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court· 2008-09-11· cited 129×
- American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court· 2008-09-11· cited 127×
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 113×
- Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 105×
- State v. IrizarryWashington Supreme Court· 1988-10-27· cited 93×
- Soundgarden v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court· 1994-04-14· cited 73×
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-26· cited 67×
- Witters v. Commission for the BlindWashington Supreme Court· 1989-04-20· cited 58×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1989-05-04· cited 56×
- Ford Motor Co. v. BarrettWashington Supreme Court· 1990-11-15· cited 48×
- Bradburn v. North Central Regional Library DistrictWashington Supreme Court· 2010-05-06· cited 48×
- Bradburn v. NORTH CENT. REGIONAL LIBRARYWashington Supreme Court· 2010-05-06· cited 46×
- State v. E.J.Y.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-14· cited 44×
- Vec v. State Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 41×
- Voters Education Committee v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 40×
- American Bush v. City of South Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court· 2006-07-28· cited 38×
- Bedford v. SugarmanWashington Supreme Court· 1989-05-04· cited 36×
- State Ex Rel. Gallwey v. GrimmWashington Supreme Court· 2002-06-13· cited 30×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 3,080×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 1,093×
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- A Book Named \John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure\ v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 892×
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 810×
- Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1987-05-04· cited 672×
- Mishkin v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 464×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-08-18· cited 319×
- Kaplan v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 319×
- State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court· 1984-09-06· cited 294×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-23· cited 285×
- Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 256×
- State v. FainWashington Supreme Court· 1980-10-02· cited 170×
- State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court· 1984-01-26· cited 165×
- Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental CouncilWashington Supreme Court· 1981-10-15· cited 159×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.