Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rosenberg

Citations

  • 398 N.E.2d 451
  • 379 Mass. 334
  • 5 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2339
  • 1979 Mass. LEXIS 1013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • proof of knowledge must be personal to the defendant but may be had by inference from all the facts and circumstances developed at the trial
  • Commonwealth failed to present more than speculative inference of scienter
  • “had seen, or should have seen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Kaplan, Liacos, Abrams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.