Bryers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• subjective impression of witness insufficient to sustain obscenity conviction “no matter how detailed the description”
• statute defining obscene material as that which, taken as whole appeals to prurient interest, is patently offensive, and is utterly without redeeming social value is not unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).