State v. Finklea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a trial court is vested with broad discretion in dealing with the range and propriety of closing arguments and its rulings on such matters ordinarily will not be disturbed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bixby
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-16· cited 26×
• State v. McEachern
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 26×
• State v. Motts
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-03-21· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dusky v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
• Drope v. Missouri
  Supreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
• State v. Linder
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-05-14· cited 114×
• State v. Shuler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 104×
• Robert Wilson v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1968-01-18· cited 102×
• Singleton v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-30· cited 49×
• State v. Northcutt
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-20· cited 38×
• State v. Weik
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-09-03· cited 22×
• State v. Passaro
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-07-29· cited 19×
• State v. Huggins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-08-23· cited 18×