Supreme Court of South Carolina· 9/14/1998
State v. Gardner
Citations
- 505 S.E.2d 338
- 332 S.C. 389
- 1998 S.C. LEXIS 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admitting a close-up color photograph of the victim’s face in the sentencing phase of the trial where she had been shot in the face five times
- admitting a close-up color photograph of the victim's face in the sentencing phase of the trial where she had been shot in the face five times
- precluding issued from appellate review where appellant objected but failed to articulate any meaningful grounds for the trial court’s consideration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kelly v. Wauconda Park DistrictSupreme Court· 1987-03-23· cited 88×
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-20· cited 80×
- State v. KornahrensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-10-13· cited 73×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-03-13· cited 67×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-10-05· cited 64×
- State v. ByramSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-28· cited 57×
- Solimine v. International Law Students Ass'nSupreme Court· 1995-10-02· cited 47×
- State v. MotleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1968-11-19· cited 34×
- Solomon v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-04-18· cited 30×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-05-30· cited 19×
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-12-29· cited 17×
- State v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-12· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.