Skip to main content
· 6/9/1997

Doe v. S.B.M.

Citations

  • 488 S.E.2d 878
  • 327 S.C. 352
  • 1997 S.C. App. LEXIS 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a contemporaneous objection is “required to properly preserve an error for appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Goolsby, Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.