Court of Appeals of Washington· 11/14/2003
State v. Howell
Citations
- 79 P.3d 451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing Wake and State’s requested continuance one day before trial when it was aware of unavailability two weeks before
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 629×
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 2001-06-07· cited 214×
- State v. McNealWashington Supreme Court· 2002-01-03· cited 177×
- State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court· 1978-03-09· cited 101×
- State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court· 1978-11-22· cited 88×
- State v. Farr-LenziniCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-08· cited 76×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-29· cited 48×
- Herring v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-01-16· cited 46×
- Herring v. DEPT. OF SOC. AND HEALTH SERV.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-03-29· cited 45×
- State v. PestaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-08-25· cited 23×
- State v. WakeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-12-28· cited 17×
- State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-09-22· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.