State v. Wake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that actions of the employees of crime lab are considered actions of the State
• observing that actions of the employees of crime lab are considered actions of the State
• observing that actions of the employees of crime lab are considered actions of the State
• observing that actions of the employees of crime lab are considered actions of the State
• insufficient staff to process drug cases not unavoidable circumstances beyond the State’s control
• unavailability of toxicologist witness due to congestion at State crime lab should not be sufficient to allow continuances that exceed the speedy trial period because the State would then have no incentive to remedy the problem

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).